About [[User:Michael]], I wrote:
I'd like him to be banned. He may well return under a different name, but it's got to be worth a go.
In fact, this seems to be the same chap who a while ago made a stack of inexplicable [[Year in MTV]] pages - nobody knew what they were for, and after asking him if he could explain to no response, they were deleted. He's been around for a while. He seems determined, so it might be best to *not* ban him so as to keep all his user contributions in the one place. They'll be easier to revert that way.
But maybe that's too clever, I don't know.
lp (camembert) "A finished work is exactly that, requires resurrection." --John Cage
It might be nice to have it in the software that a sysop can blanket revert any changes made by Michael... etc... I dont know what form this can take, but Its taken 15 minutes of my time, Cam's time and TUF's time... each... -SV
Stevertigo wrote:
It might be nice to have it in the software that a sysop can blanket revert any changes made by Michael... etc... I dont know what form this can take, but Its taken 15 minutes of my time, Cam's time and TUF's time... each... -SV
Having to clean up these things is a fact of life, letting this be done by automation seems to be a cure that's worse than the disease.
Ec
At 18:51 07/03/2003 -0800, SV wrote:
It might be nice to have it in the software that a sysop can blanket revert any changes made by Michael... etc... I dont know what form this can take, but Its taken 15 minutes of my time, Cam's time and TUF's time... each... -SV
This might sound petty, but I spent two hours last night (not fifteen minutes) clearing up after this fellow, including removing faked comments he added to [[Talk:Crass]] and attributed to other users (at least, I *would* have removed them if he didn't add them at such a prodigious rate, making edit conflicts inevitable). If it had only been fifteen minutes, I would have never written to the list.
lp (Camembert) WikiKarma: bit more at [[William Walton]]