Thannk you very much, I am going to go way out of my way not to revert
more than once every 24 hours, and to avoid this particular subject
for awhile as well. Your action gives me a very positive feeling about
the project, its rules, and the spirit behind them. Frankly, if it
were up to me, non-vandalism reverts wouldn't be allowed at all. I
really wish there could be some final say on differences of opinion,
or at least a more functional and civil manner of achieving concensus
than the current approach. I don't have an easy answer, and am aware
of the dangers of instruction creep, but I do think this is an
important problem, with reprecussions both in article quality and
editor stress and satisfaction.
Jack
On 5/27/05, David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
Jack Lynch (jack.i.lynch(a)gmail.com) [050527 21:08]:
I've unblocked, though to keep the peace I would suggest you not be the one
to make it back that way again for now, but make your case on the talk
page. You'll know you've made your case when someone else makes the change.
(One of the points of 3RR is that not everything in the article has to be
correct right now :-)
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l