On 12/2/06, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2006 at 15:28, The Cunctator wrote:
On 11/29/06, Guettarda
<guettarda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It doesn't matter if the article was about [[World War II]] and the
> discussion only involved three people would voted delete on the
grounds of
> "never heard of it", DRV is
supposed to comment on process, not merits
of
deletion
(you'll be told "that's what *fD is for, and you should have
commented when you had the chance).
That's total bullshit.
Only partial bullshit. There really *are* factions around who behave
exactly as described. They aren't always the majority in the
appropriate areas at any given time, and they don't always win the
debates, but they're there.
Sorry--I didn't mean that I didn't believe Guettarda. I meant that I think
the process is dysfunctional.