Seeking a compromise isn't banned so that could have been tried. I would
have easily agreed to a reasonable compromise suggestion.
The act starts with person A proposing something and then person B making a
counter proposal. The pendulum swings for a while and eventually stops
pointing at a location everyone agrees to. In this case person B simply
decided and applied. He wasn't even willing to discuss his admin action. The
issue of the redirect itself aside, this conduct is the problem.
Granted arbcom sub pages should not be randomly edited. Changing a passed
remedy would be out of the question. I realize that...
To put it in two words, the top of the dispute resolution process is
seemingly less than prone to engage in dispute resolution on matters
concerning arbitration committee itself. This is a product of a culture that
treats arbitrators like divine entities.
- White Cat
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:51 AM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 5/17/2008 8:02:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration#Renami…
old_cases
---------------------
Yes but, in general there should be no problem created redirs to anything,
for any reason, whatsoever.
Legislating redirs in this way seems very pointy to me. ABF vs White Cat
is
hardly constructive behavior. Perhaps White Cat could simply create a
redir
of RFA/Blubber or something if White Cat doesn't like typing long names.
White Cat come up with a short redir that would not imply the case was
*about* a particular participant like RFA/WCetal or something and I'd
support that.
Will Johnson
**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
favorites at AOL Food.
(
http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l