------------- Original message --------------

actionforum@comcast.net wrote:

...

Fair enough, here are the reasons given for the block:

[...]

Do you have any appropriate links to diffs on Wikipedia to support your statements?

Diffs to show that I didn't do personal attacks today? Diffs to show that I wasn't uncivil today?

It is tough to prove a negative. Outside of the RfC, we interacted as editors here on this talk page, it was quite constructive, in fact 172 made some good edits:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANeoconservatism_in_the_Unit...

All my interaction on the RfC talk page was civil, with no attacks. As as part of the reporting of vandalism, I was required to post warnings on his and Lulu's talk pages. 172 accused me of harassing him. I asked him not to personally attack me, that this was just a required step. Here is that diff:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A172&diff=25679840&...

Let me know if you find something that can be characterized as uncivil or an attack. You are welcome to review all my contribs and edit summaries.

-- Silverback