Axle:
I couldnt agree more with your message: Now, it's important to realize that *we* set the boundaries of that sandbox.
If RKs coming back (and hopefully he will), hes going to need close supervision.
_________________________________________________________________ Share your photos without swamping your Inbox. Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
--- Abe Sokolov abesokolov@hotmail.com wrote:
I couldn�t agree more with your message: �Now, it's important to realize that *we* set the boundaries of that sandbox.�
If RK�s coming back (and hopefully he will), he�s going to need close supervision.
I would support this, if "RK" is not his username. Let user RK stay in the record of his bad personae, and let his new one, maybe "RobKai" or whatever, be a chance for him to start fresh.
~S~
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
I would support this, if "RK" is not his username. Let user RK stay in the record of his bad personae, and let his new one, maybe "RobKai" or whatever, be a chance for him to start fresh.
~S~
That doesn't make sense. What would changing his username do? We can just give him a fresh start anyway. (But actually, I think that he should be under supervision) LDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
--- Daniel Ehrenberg littledanehren@yahoo.com wrote:
That doesn't make sense. What would changing his username do? We can just give him a fresh start anyway. (But actually, I think that he should be under supervision)
The term "supervision" means nothing in itself. In fact it makes no sense-- so what do you mean by it?
The point of forcing a change of name for "RK" (if he does want to come back) is to 1:Force him to admit his *wrongdoing by making a clean break in his own mind between his previous behaviour and his future behaviour. . And 2: To keep it clear to all of *us* which edits are *Roberts*, and which *were* "RK's".
This difference between "RK" and Robert is an important distinction here that I would like people to recognize. Especially Robert, if he wants to return.
~S~
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 00:26, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
That doesn't make sense. What would changing his username do? We can just give him a fresh start anyway. (But actually, I think that he should be under supervision) LDan
What kind of supervision is everyone talking about? Every Wikipedian is under supervision by every other Wikipedian. Are we talking about something like a parole officer?
Stevertigo wrote:
--- Abe Sokolov abesokolov@hotmail.com wrote:
I couldnt agree more with your message: Now, it's important to realize that *we* set the boundaries of that sandbox.
If RKs coming back (and hopefully he will), hes going to need close supervision.
I would support this, if "RK" is not his username. Let user RK stay in the record of his bad personae, and let his new one, maybe "RobKai" or whatever, be a chance for him to start fresh.
Would you also suggest that Susan Mason and Vera Cruz take note of this?
Ec