Jimbo wrote, I have concern about people massing together in groups based on political affiliations at Wikipedia. This is exactly what was alleged in the case of Nobs01 and orthers acting in concert; Mr. Bauder stated four times there was no grounds to allege political affiliations inspired the actions of respondents, yet no finding of fact was ever made. It was a blatant abuse of prescribed dispute resolution processes by tarring five users with guilt by political association smears -- and worked very effectively to obscure evidence. And the clique that engineered this purge and show trial has a free license to continue the same against whoever their imagined enemies are. nobs _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

> Nobs was banned for personal attacks, not for his right wing >political views. There are political blocks operating on Wikipedia,

Nobs and his co-defendants were not such a block, nor could one say The way the case was handled lends itself to an appearance of unfairness, beginning with Cberlet's abuse of process, which nobs defined on day one, and the failure of the Committee to respond to evidence.