An aggressive and vocal minority of users (including some administrators who are known to aggressively hammer 'opponents') wanting to be able to remove on-Wiki references and links to web sites that specifically have targeted them. In and of itself, this is not a Bad Thing on the surface. However, their implementation and ideas do not enjoy widespread community support or endorsement, as evidenced by the backlash they face each time they try to do it. In spite of this, they have now extended this to: 1. Damaging articles and the encyclopedia (Will Beback and his abuse during over Teresa Hayden's site). 2. Specifically have 'broken' two RFAs by dropping poison pills on them (Cla68 and Gracenotes), disrupting Wikipedia for political gain. 3. They have made the notion of "attack sites" political and sociological poison, to damage their Wikipedia "enemies". Someone really needs to throw out the bathwater, without murdering the baby as seems to be the intent here with the BADSITES gamesmanship. Apologies for any frankness that cuts through undeserved AGF. Regards, Joe http://www.joeszilagyi.com