Hi Danny, does each response from you require an additional thread? Just
curious.
Nathan
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:19 PM, <daniwo59(a)aol.com> wrote:
While we are at it, I suppose that now, Erik, you also
reject the old edit
war you were engaged in on the Bomis article as to whether it was
pornography:
_http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bomis&diff=32643882&oldi…
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bomis&diff=32643882&oldid…)
is just one example
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bomis#Links_to_archived_Bomis_inactive_
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bomis#Links_to_archived_Bomis_inactive)
I find this quote from you in the following section especially telling of
a
sudden change in tone:
"First, as I've said to you, this is about documenting the history of
_Bomis_
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomis) truthfully, follwing the NPOV and
not
using euphemisms. Due to Wikipedia's affiliation with Bomis, Wikipedians'
loyalty to Jimmy Wales, and the press interest in this history, it is
easy to
violate our most sacred policies when dealing with this topic. I must
encourage
all contributors to edit these articles with our policies in mind. There
are
no special exceptions to NPOV."
Oversight, anyone?
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (
http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l