-----Original Message----- From: Daniel R. Tobias [mailto:dan@tobias.name] Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 04:37 PM To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On 2 Jul 2007 at 16:41:33 +0000, "Fred Bauder" fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
Then why exactly did you recently remove a link to a Wikipedia diff that in turn linked to Wikipedia Review, and endorse the 24-hour block of the person who had posted that link, all the while saying that this was justified only when a specific arbitration ruling had been made on the specific site?
I misread the link. Made a mistake. Embarrassing, but needs to be said. Unless the link to Wikipedia Review is pretty nasty, it doesn't violate the rule about linking to attack sites. That said, I think there may be some problems with the edit. Actually I think it is original research, a whole other matter. But certainly not a blockable offense.
Fred