Just to clarify, I was referring to Lir's post -- I also found it puzzling and agree with Ed's assessment of the inherent contradiction:

Lir wrote:

In short, Plautus is adding the kind of information which the Wikipedia should contain. I will agree that this information should not be presented as NPOV fact, it most certainly should be presented with an "experts tend to disagree" disclaimer -- however, it should NOT be deleted.

Thanks, Brian (Bcorr)

Ed Poor wrote:

Bcorr used this puzzling phrase:

• "NPOV facts"

1. Excuse me, folks, but that is a blatant contradiction in terms. I see

the terms "POV" and "NPOV" misused quite a lot, and I think this misuse betrays a fundamental misunderstanding.