On 15 Apr 2007 at 09:55:38 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
If someone started a new article on the Dalai
Lama that said he eats
babies, we would delete it like a shot. We would not ''undelete'' it
in order to write a new, sourced article. That would be pointless and
stupid.
I looked at that discussion. People disagree with you over not counting
sources as sources. It would not be possible to create an article that
says the Dalai Lama eats babies and is sourced; apparently, this article
*is* sourced, making the comparison inapt.
Sure it is...
"the Dalai Lama... eats babies" -- Guy Chapman, on wikien-l, 15 Apr
2007
"the Dalai Lama eats babies... is sourced" -- Ken Arromdee, on wikien-
l, 15 Apr 2007
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: