I'm glad to see everything has been sorted out. But 1 thing puzzles me.
Erik wrote . . . this enforces a class distinction that I am not very comfortable with. I think it should be avoided.
. . . I have now edited the policy to favor my interpretation -- this is of course open to discussion.
Surely some contradition, Erik? You rewrite the rules unilaterally to stop someone unilaterally doing what you disapprove of. You are opposed to cabals because they exclude people, so you unilaterally rewrite the rules to stop people unilaterally excluding people. :-)
Is this what we should call 'Erik's Law of Unilateralist Logic'? :-)
JT
_________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
james-
. . . I have now edited the policy to favor my interpretation -- this is of course open to discussion.
Surely some contradition, Erik?
Not at all, James. Wikipedia policy pages can be openly edited by anyone, as they could always be.
Regards,
Erik