I would like to draw everyone's attention to the [[Childlover]] page. I am not taking a position on the issue, but I do believe that this is one topic we must be very careful of. Our reputation as a reliable source can be severely impeded if we are perceived (whether right or wrong) as promoting pedophilia. While I am not saying that we should censor the page, I do think that everyone should take a very careful look at it to see that we do not cross any boundaries that can be potentially harmful to us.
Danny
On 07/13/04 at 07:35 PM, daniwo59@aol.com said:
I would like to draw everyone's attention to the [[Childlover]] page.
The term "childlover" appears, presumably for tactical reasons, to be essentially a synonym for pedophilia, so shouldn't the contents of the page simply be merged with [[Pedophilia]], which already has a one-line paragraph on the term?
Also, I am not in favor of moralizing, even indirectly, but if there is clinical evidence that sex with children is not healthy, that surely it should be reported. The text as it now stands reads like a defense against a charge which is not explicitly made evident.
V.