In a message dated 4/23/2009 1:42:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time, dgerard@gmail.com writes:
* NPOV (I don't think so, lots have tried this) * Notability (possibly - our breadth is our key asset, and overapplied "notability" rules trash this) * NOR (maybe - note that not every Wikipedia has this rule) * Expert privilege (Citizendium is trying this, we'll see how it goes)>>
----------------------------------
Money.. and author credit. Knol is trying that.
Will **************Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219799634x1201361008/aol?redir=http... eclick.net%2Fclk%3B214133440%3B36002254%3Bj)
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:44 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/23/2009 1:42:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time, dgerard@gmail.com writes:
- NPOV (I don't think so, lots have tried this)
- Notability (possibly - our breadth is our key asset, and overapplied
"notability" rules trash this)
- NOR (maybe - note that not every Wikipedia has this rule)
- Expert privilege (Citizendium is trying this, we'll see how it goes)>>
Money.. and author credit. Knol is trying that.
I wouldn't say money is a big part of what's different about Knol. Author credit, sure. But also NPOV, Notability, NOR, Expert privilege, licensing, OWN, etc. Knol is very very different from Wikipedia. In fact, I'd even say they're *slightly* too different.