On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Timwi wrote:
Now, [[User:Imran]] came along and added
{{msg:unverified}} to one of
them:
http://tinyurl.com/2t5bd - This, I can understand, because I
completely forgot to mention the source of the image and everything.
However, the same user added {{msg:GFDL}} to the other image:
http://tinyurl.com/2auzx - This, I'm a little puzzled about. How were
they to know that the image was GFDLed?
I was going on the assumption (as some of the other taggers are) that
if the photo was taken by a wikipedian and that the wikipedian was likely
to understand the GFDL (primarily sysops and other long-term regulars)
then unless they stated otherwise I assumed that it was under GFDL (as the
image upload page states). If I'm not satisfied on either of these
accounts then I mark it unverified.
When I came across the first image I wasn't sure and didn't check your
userpage, but when I came across the other images from Cambridge I checked
it and came to the conclusion that you took the photos and were familiar
with the GFDL upload policy.
Normally in most cases I would mark an image with no information as
unverified, as I'm trying to work fairly rapidly through the images
(spending 5-10 seconds/image) and unless there's a block of images
uploaded by the same user I don't normally bother to try and find out what
the licence should be.
Imran
--
http://bits.bris.ac.uk/imran