[[Wikipedia:Paradoxes]] - just some high-level brainstorming about the basic sillinesses of wanting stuff to be stuff, even while that stuff is always changing.
-Stevertigo
Here is the simple way to explain why the answer to any paradox is no. Can God crush an uncrushable stone? If God exists, then the uncrushable stone does not. If an uncrushable stone exists, then God does not. _______ I do not believe in uncrushable stones.
"stevertigo" stvrtg@gmail.com wrote in message news:7c402e010907101024s27758e13v7b4397dccc6386c5@mail.gmail.com...
[[Wikipedia:Paradoxes]] - just some high-level brainstorming about the basic sillinesses of wanting stuff to be stuff, even while that stuff is always changing.
-Stevertigo
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/7/16 Jay Litwyn brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca:
Here is the simple way to explain why the answer to any paradox is no. Can God crush an uncrushable stone? If God exists, then the uncrushable stone does not. If an uncrushable stone exists, then God does not.
"Emacs can create a core dump it can't edit."
- d.
On 16/07/2009, Jay Litwyn brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca wrote:
Here is the simple way to explain why the answer to any paradox is no. Can God crush an uncrushable stone? If God exists, then the uncrushable stone does not. If an uncrushable stone exists, then God does not. _______ I do not believe in uncrushable stones.
Me, I don't believe in proof by disbelief...
...but I can't prove it.