On 8 Jun 2007 at 23:54:56 -0600, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Risker wrote:
The simplest way would be to check MONGO's contributions for the period around 0500 and 1800 on June 8th, but it appears he has reverted at least some of his edits, and other people reverted other edits. Of course, some people might consider that wikistalking.
That sort of thing is what the user contributions list is _for_.
Then how come I got accused of "stalking" MONGO, by administrators no less, on my user talk page and AN/I, for using it?
On 6/9/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 8 Jun 2007 at 23:54:56 -0600, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Risker wrote:
The simplest way would be to check MONGO's contributions for the
period
around 0500 and 1800 on June 8th, but it appears he has reverted at
least
some of his edits, and other people reverted other edits. Of course,
some
people might consider that wikistalking.
That sort of thing is what the user contributions list is _for_.
Then how come I got accused of "stalking" MONGO, by administrators no less, on my user talk page and AN/I, for using it?
Because even admins make mistakes?
James Farrar wrote:
On 09/06/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
Because even admins make mistakes?
Surely not! :)
I thought I made a mistake once, but I turned out to be wrong.