Just in case any of you out there think that Michael is "misunderstood" or reformed or just not getting a fair shake, I'd like to inform you all that Michael has started his death threats again.
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target...
What a misunderstood fellow, let's all welcome him back now, OK?
----- Dante Alighieri dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of great moral crisis." -Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dante Alighieri wrote:
Just in case any of you out there think that Michael is "misunderstood" or reformed or just not getting a fair shake, I'd like to inform you all that Michael has started his death threats again.
Interesting edit summaries he writes! But just as a note of pedantry, telling someone to die is not a threat, but a command...
But seriously, is this really a productive use of anyone's time:
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Taang%21_Records&action=hist...
?
To revert one of Michael's edits when you *know* that he's just going to revert it straight back again is an exercise in futility. Can anyone put forward any cogent argument for doing something that you know perfectly well will be undone as soon as you've done it?
Why not do the following: 1. Leave notes on the developers' talk pages, asking if they could block whatever user account he is then using; 2. Wait until that has been done; 3. Go to his user contributions page and revert all his edits in one fell swoop?
That would save a lot of time.
Oliver
+-------------------------------------------+ | Oliver Pereira | | Dept. of Electronics and Computer Science | | University of Southampton | | omp199@ecs.soton.ac.uk | +-------------------------------------------+