<<In a message dated 1/6/2009 4:17:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, cbeckhorn(a)fastmail.fm writes: The result described at [[Green-Tao_theorem]] was groundbreaking and of extraordinary scientific interest. It will no doubt eventually be covered in a text some day. The present article is just a stub, but if we were to expand the article to something longer, the main sources at the moment would have to be journal articles. There is a 0% chance this article would be deleted at AFD.>> ----- I think "extraordinary scientific interest" is pushing it ;) It is *already* covered in a text. In fact, I note, just on Google Books, at least six print secondary sources which *mention* it, and a few go into details. You mistake my point, if you think I was suggesting that an article, with secondary mentions, even if trivial, is an AfD candidate. What I was suggesting is that an article with no secondary mentions (of any kind, whatsoever) is probably a good AfD candidate. However the main point here is on the appropriate mix of primary and secondary sources. We're not really discussing AfD quite. Will Johnson **************New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026)