On 12/15/05, Brian <brian0918(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But, the
reality is, the majority of the George W. Bush article is
alright and in need of little editing.
You says it's alright and in little need of editing, so we don't have
to worry about the fact that you are deliberately taking steps that
you know will hinder editing of the article.
You appear to have admitted that you're deliberately taking steps to
maliciously hinder the editing of this article. I think that can be
regarded as vandalism. Please stop it, the article does not belong to
you and you do not have the right to render bona fide editing of the
article extremely difficult.
If it's vandalism, it's the first vandalism to be universally supported
on an article's talk page. Thank you for picking one sentence to attack
and ignoring the rest of my statement.