On 12/15/05, Brian brian0918@gmail.com wrote:
But, the reality is, the majority of the George W. Bush article is alright and in need of little editing.
You says it's alright and in little need of editing, so we don't have to worry about the fact that you are deliberately taking steps that you know will hinder editing of the article.
You appear to have admitted that you're deliberately taking steps to maliciously hinder the editing of this article. I think that can be regarded as vandalism. Please stop it, the article does not belong to you and you do not have the right to render bona fide editing of the article extremely difficult.
If it's vandalism, it's the first vandalism to be universally supported on an article's talk page. Thank you for picking one sentence to attack and ignoring the rest of my statement.