http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article574234.ece
(I suspect the "company source" was found by the writer by the popular process of "psychic journalism.")
- d.
On 12/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article574234.ece
(I suspect the "company source" was found by the writer by the popular process of "psychic journalism.")
A positive article in the Sun... we may as well close up shop now, our credibility is gone. I'm just curious what company the "company source" was from...
And here we have the future of the Wall Street Journal.
On Dec 12, 2007 9:25 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article574234.ece
(I suspect the "company source" was found by the writer by the popular process of "psychic journalism.")
A positive article in the Sun... we may as well close up shop now, our credibility is gone. I'm just curious what company the "company source" was from...
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 12/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article574234.ece
(I suspect the "company source" was found by the writer by the popular process of "psychic journalism.")
A positive article in the Sun... we may as well close up shop now, our credibility is gone. I'm just curious what company the "company source" was from...
I notice they don't actually specify which company the source was from. Could it be a Sun representative coming up a suitably salacious slip of the tongue?
Siobhan
On 12/12/2007, Siobhan Hansa helenseal@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
A positive article in the Sun... we may as well close up shop now, our credibility is gone. I'm just curious what company the "company source" was from...
I notice they don't actually specify which company the source was from. Could it be a Sun representative coming up a suitably salacious slip of the tongue?
I certainly hope you're not implying that any employee of News Corp. would ever act in a manner that might be perceived as unethical.
- d.
Aren't you excited to see what great strides News Corp makes with 'improving' the level of journalism at the Wall Street Journal? Maybe then we can have front page coverage of our porn-star lists in a major newspaper!
On Dec 14, 2007 10:23 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/12/2007, Siobhan Hansa helenseal@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
A positive article in the Sun... we may as well close up shop now, our credibility is gone. I'm just curious what company the "company source" was from...
I notice they don't actually specify which company the source was from. Could it be a Sun representative coming up a suitably salacious slip of the tongue?
I certainly hope you're not implying that any employee of News Corp. would ever act in a manner that might be perceived as unethical.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 14/12/2007, Nathan Awrich nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
Aren't you excited to see what great strides News Corp makes with 'improving' the level of journalism at the Wall Street Journal? Maybe then we can have front page coverage of our porn-star lists in a major newspaper!
Can't wait to see Alan Greenspan on page 3.
- d.
On 12/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article574234.ece
(I suspect the "company source" was found by the writer by the popular process of "psychic journalism.")
- d.
The wikipedia article has been around for years. I think the number of views it gets is due to the number of links from actress articles.
Btw since wikipedia has 5 syllables what is it doing in the sun at all?
On 12/12/2007, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Btw since wikipedia has 5 syllables what is it doing in the sun at all?
"Wi-cky". I realise that's one more than they're comfortable with. But I see the photo is back on [[Autofellatio]], so there's something for them to look at.
- d.
On 12/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article574234.ece
(I suspect the "company source" was found by the writer by the popular process of "psychic journalism.")
The company source makes a verbal slip. There is exactly one person a UK journalist would likely be talking to on the phone.
Come on, David, you can *admit* it...
;-)