For those of you foolish enough to use Wikipedia as a source, you should check out the bells and whistles on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Cite , when it's up and working.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Cite?page=Red_Sox
The projects could still use a good Wikicite project, to collage citation information about non-WP content... to provide that kind of comprehensive multi-format citation detail about every cite used in/by an article, and offer editors a place to comment on the citations (quality, reliability, disambiguation with better-known cites) themselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikicite
++SJ
SJ wrote:
For those of you foolish enough to use Wikipedia as a source, you should check out the bells and whistles on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Cite , when it's up and working.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Cite?page=Red_Sox
The projects could still use a good Wikicite project, to collage citation information about non-WP content... to provide that kind of comprehensive multi-format citation detail about every cite used in/by an article, and offer editors a place to comment on the citations (quality, reliability, disambiguation with better-known cites) themselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikicite
++SJ
Ohhhh. Shiny...
Thank you!
-- Neil