In a message dated 2/24/2008 1:34:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, eugene@vanderpijll.nl writes:
We *do* have a rule that says exactly that; it's not a matter of interpretation. Have you read [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]]? That complete page, including the guideline examples, is policy.>>
----------------- Please quote that section of Non-free which states that book covers may never be used for any purpose, on-Wiki. Thanks
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
WJhonson@aol.com schreef:
In a message dated 2/24/2008 1:34:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, eugene@vanderpijll.nl writes:
We *do* have a rule that says exactly that; it's not a matter of interpretation. Have you read [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]]? That complete page, including the guideline examples, is policy.>>
Please quote that section of Non-free which states that book covers may never be used for any purpose, on-Wiki. Thanks
I apologize for removing too much context. The example you gave was
"If, in a biography of Patti Smith, we have no free images of Patti Smith, but we have a book cover of her biography writen by John Brown or whatever, and that book cover, is in fact, a photograph of Patti Smith, we can and should use it in the article."
And then in the same paragraph: "I'm not suggesting we have a rule for not using book covers."
I thought you meant, a rule for not using book covers *in that context*. Which there is.
Eugene