There is major sockpuppeting in the current Wipipedia deletion debate which is being investigated. I would not close that one without consulting with the checkusers who have been investigating it.
Fred
-----Original Message----- From: Ron Ritzman [mailto:ritzman@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:13 PM To: 'Bogdan Giusca', 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Psychosis and Wikipedia
On 5/15/07, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
I doubt that [[Wipipedia]] will be kept. It's far less notable than GNAA and its has absolutely no reliable third party sources. We know how GNAA ended up...
I dunno, it's survived several AFDs already just as GNAA did. It took a special AFD where only editors with X number of edits (100 I think) were allowed to "vote" to get a clean close. If we don't get a clean close on the Wipipedia AFD, it might be necessary to do that again.
By "clean close" I mean a clear "KEEP" or "DELETE" without sockpuppets, posses, or DRV overturns.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l