"Denny Colt" wrote
But not everyone is also an admin. Non-admins can't do that, and there might be an article that *should* exist for whatever reason--notable subject, say--but the current article is a complete mess that the person maybe feels they don't have the time or ability to clean themselves.
So it looks like the correct approach is for any editor confronted with a clear BLP problem to hack out, there and then, the worst (unsourced attack) stuff, and drop a note onto [[WP:BLPN]] as an alert/request for help.
Charles
----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:18:47 +0100, charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
So it looks like the correct approach is for any editor confronted with a clear BLP problem to hack out, there and then, the worst (unsourced attack) stuff, and drop a note onto [[WP:BLPN]] as an alert/request for help.
Yes, that seems like the best approach.
Guy (JzG)