He is treating other users with contempt. I've not been the victim of it, so I have no personal axe to grind here, but there seems to be no sign of a moderation of his behavior. He even treats Jimbo with contempt. He tore up Jimbo's Yellow Card, time he got the Red Card and was sent off for a week. If he's no better after that, we have real work to do. We don't need the grief and substantial waste of time this misguided and destructive individual produces.
He tore up Jimbo's Yellow Card, time he got the Red Card and was sent off for a week. If he's no better after that, we have real work to do. We don't need the grief and substantial waste of time this misguided and destructive individual produces.
More Wisdom from Michael: Im in favor of a suspension.
Yeah. I clicked that link. The link you've type above is http://www.firstgaytime.com . It appears to be a gay porn site. You might want to quote what it is you're referring to. -- [[User:Tarquin|Tarquin]] 00:14 Mar 14, 2003 (UTC) + : It was a joke. I was kidding. Of course didn't let girls suck [[George Washington]]'s penis and let his wife suck on her friend who is a girl's vagina.
At 17:02 13/03/2003 -0800, SV wrote:
He tore up Jimbo's Yellow Card, time he got the Red Card and was sent off for a week. If he's no better after that, we have real work to do. We don't need the grief and substantial waste of time this misguided and destructive individual produces.
More Wisdom from Michael: Im in favor of a suspension.
In principle I'm all for a ban, but in practice I don't think it will achieve anything. He'll only come back under different IP numbers (as he has done before) and make similar edits. It's better not to ban him so as to keep all his edits under the one name. They're easier to check and edit or revert that way, rather than them being spread out over a dozens of different IP numbers. As it is, he sometimes edits while not signed in, but only rarely.
At the same time, I don't think we should bother ourselves too much about trying to talk to him, explain things to him and that sort of thing. We've done enough of that already and we've just been sworn at and had our comments deleted.
What we should do about the questionable details he's been adding about album release dates, Grammy winners and that sort of thing (whether we should remove them all because some have been shown to be incorrect, or keep them until they are proven to be wrong even though they're not very easy things to check), I don't know.
lp (camembert) WikiKarma: [[Symphony No. 3 (Mahler)]]
In principle I'm all for a ban, but in practice I don't think it will achieve anything. He'll only come back under different IP numbers (as he has done before) and make similar edits. It's better not to ban him so as to keep all his edits under the one name. They're easier to check and edit or revert that way, rather than them being spread out over a dozens of different IP numbers. As it is, he sometimes edits while not signed in,
but
only rarely.
At the same time, I don't think we should bother ourselves too much about trying to talk to him, explain things to him and that sort of thing. We've done enough of that already and we've just been sworn at and had our comments deleted.
What we should do about the questionable details he's been adding about album release dates, Grammy winners and that sort of thing (whether we should remove them all because some have been shown to be incorrect, or keep them until they are proven to be wrong even though they're not very easy things to check), I don't know.
Hm. Anything not easily verifyable, perhaps even track times, etc, should be reverted, I think. Ive checked a few of his 'facts' before, and they were ok... What I really want to do with this eleven year old is call up his Mommy and get him busted. -SV