http://asterling.typepad.com/incipit_vita_nova/2009/09/wikipedia- ludicrously-sexist-and-racist-part-ii.html
Just another person complaining that "Wikipedia is soooo POV in this way... and that way," "wikipedia is full of idiot writing useless articles," and "it's horribly sexist and racist!"
I am still trying to figure out what she meant by "village tool"... does anyone else know?
-X!
2009/9/8 Soxred93 soxred93@gmail.com:
http://asterling.typepad.com/incipit_vita_nova/2009/09/wikipedia- ludicrously-sexist-and-racist-part-ii.html
Just another person complaining that "Wikipedia is soooo POV in this way... and that way," "wikipedia is full of idiot writing useless articles," and "it's horribly sexist and racist!"
I am still trying to figure out what she meant by "village tool"... does anyone else know?
-X!
It makes more sense if you did out the previous post:
http://asterling.typepad.com/incipit_vita_nova/2009/03/is-wikipedia-sexist-a...
Apparently the problem is that wikipedian are following the general trend of writeing about white men (actually wikipedians mostly writes about inanimate objects). NOR makes this fairly inevitable. Given a few centuries the only bits of history that people remember are the bits written in blood and over the the last few centuries European males have had rather a lot of such history while keeping their civilisations intact enough to write about it.
Soxred93 wrote:
http://asterling.typepad.com/incipit_vita_nova/2009/09/wikipedia- ludicrously-sexist-and-racist-part-ii.html
Just another person complaining that "Wikipedia is soooo POV in this way... and that way," "wikipedia is full of idiot writing useless articles," and "it's horribly sexist and racist!"
I am still trying to figure out what she meant by "village tool"... does anyone else know?
That would be tool as in http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tool
-- Tim Starling