When 168 got into a deletion/undeletion war by trying to delete complaints about him, people changed their votes on my temporary desysopping poll such that it went from 5-4 in favour to 11-2 in favour. Accordingly, I desysopped him immediately. The poll is at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Possible_misuses_of_admin_privil eges
Can the arbitration committee or Jimbo please review 168's desysopping, and advise whether it should be permanent? Or if not, what the term should be?
-- Tim Starling
Tim Starling wrote:
Can the arbitration committee or Jimbo please review 168's desysopping, and advise whether it should be permanent? Or if not, what the term should be?
I'm trying to get out of the businesss of reviewing such matters on a permanent basis, but of course we're still in transition. I do give my blessing to Tim's action here as an emergency measure.
--Jimbo