In reply to Mark Gallagher: "That's *not* what it's based on. Please take more care before jumping to conclusions in the future...I don't know why the GFDL always allows commercial use. Presumably it's part of the whole ideological "copyleft is beautiful" bizzo. I've taken great pains to avoid understanding how the Free Software Movement people think, and I cherish my ignorance in this regard.
Given that the entire issue centers on just why commercial use is allowed, with all respect, I'm not sure how youre helping me on this one. Regards, Mike
G'day Mike,
In reply to Mark Gallagher: "That's *not* what it's based on. Please take more care before jumping to conclusions in the future...I don't know why the GFDL always allows commercial use. Presumably it's part of the whole ideological "copyleft is beautiful" bizzo. I've taken great pains to avoid understanding how the Free Software Movement people think, and I cherish my ignorance in this regard.
Given that the entire issue centers on just why commercial use is allowed, with all respect, I'm not sure how youre helping me on this one.
The entire issue, at the time I opened my big mouth, was why *non*-commercial-use on Wikipedia is not allowed. The discussion has since evolved.
Please take more care before jumping to conclusions in the future ... hang on, I've said that before, haven't I?