geni wrote:

Not all dissputes are over NPOV.

I know not all uses are for POV forks. But most of them are, and it's a blatant encouragement to do so.

Some editors have a fondness for the idea of POV forking so as to minimise editor conflict; but this makes a bad and non-NPOV article at the expense of readers for the sake of problem editors. It's the editors that are being problematic, not the article; whack their heads together, don't make a bad article.

I mean, WTF. Voting on NPOV?

- d.