According to this other thread the name of the Nazi wiki will be Pseudodoxia http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=225536&highlight=wikipe...
is there anyway to prevent them from forking wikipedia. I'm sure a lot of editors would be displeased to see their work on a neo-Nazi site. It might be too late to stop them from using existing material but could any of the rights be rewritten to prevent them from using future revisions and new material?
BTW, here is "Amalekite"'s "Wikipedia Intelligence Report #1":
Reply With Quote Frank Sinatra View Public Profile Send a private message to Frank Sinatra Find More Posts by Frank Sinatra Old Yesterday, 04:11 PM #4 Frank Sinatra Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 6 Frank Sinatra is on a distinguished road Location: Default Re: Zionist Cabal taking over Wikipedia Wikipedia Intelligence Report #001
The following is an incomplete list of those suspected to be members of, or to be the "useful idiots" of, the so-called "Elders of Wikipedia" (the Zionist cabal which has Wikipedia in its grip). Those at the top of the list are definite members and are the most ruthless and vicious of the bunch; those at the bottom I'm less sure about. Monitor the activities of the first 5 on the list (watch their user contribution pages and their user talk pages) and you'll have a good idea of what the entire gang is up to.
The suspected "Elders of Wikipedia" are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jayjg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jfdwolff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gzuckier http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IZAK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eliezer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TShilo12 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Max_rspct http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ezra_Wax http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MathKnight http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Leifern http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Humus_sapiens http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fintor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kuratowski%27s_Ghost http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PhatJew http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RachelBrown http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SlimVirgin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpgordon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jdavidb http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Themindset http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robert_McClenon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RyanFreisling
From: "Ryan W. (Merovingian)" bigwiki@earthling.net Date: 2005/08/19 Fri PM 06:40:57 EST To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia
What a ridiculous idea! It completely defeats the purpose of having a wiki, _especially_ if they're going to run it like Nazis!
--Ryan
PS. Somebody please tell them to stop using our name. Something tells me that I might go to Hell/be excommunicated (yeah, somebody's going to the give the Pope my IP) if I post on a neo-Nazi forum.
From: andyl2004@sympatico.ca Subject: [WikiEN-l] A neo-Nazi wikipedia
The neo-Nazi site "Stormfront" operated by Don Black is preparing to launch its own "Stormfront Wikipedia" via Mediawiki
-- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
is there anyway to prevent them from forking wikipedia. I'm sure a lot of editors would be displeased to see their work on a neo-Nazi site. It might be too late to stop them from using existing material but could any of the rights be rewritten to prevent them from using future revisions and new material?
I would be opposed to any move in that direction.
Regards, Haukur
andyl2004@sympatico.ca stated for the record:
According to this other thread the name of the Nazi wiki will be Pseudodoxia http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=225536&highlight=wikipe...
is there anyway to prevent them from forking wikipedia. I'm sure a lot of editors would be displeased to see their work on a neo-Nazi site.
It's not "their work." If they do not want their writing to be edited mercilessly BY NAZIS and redistributed at will BY NAZIS, they should not have submitted it.
I was working on about three different ways of responding to the point, but Sean pretty much pwned me there.
-Snowspinner
On Aug 19, 2005, at 7:57 PM, Sean Barrett wrote:
It's not "their work." If they do not want their writing to be edited mercilessly BY NAZIS and redistributed at will BY NAZIS, they should not have submitted it.
-- Sean Barrett | I'm a big fan of scientific advancement, sean@epoptic.com | especially if nudity's involved. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Snowspinner stated for the record:
I was working on about three different ways of responding to the point, but Sean pretty much pwned me there.
Woot! I didn't make the list of "Elders of Wikipedia," but I least I pwned Snowspinner. My week isn't a total loss!
Nazism is just *conservatism taken to levels of *fascism, with a racialist concept of ethnicity as its focus.
For any ethno-fascists to dip their toes into the world of an open society is a really great thing. The more communicative and better informed they are, the less likely it is they will remain less so.
SV
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
From: andyl2004@sympatico.ca Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 6 Frank Sinatra is on a distinguished road Location: Default Re: Zionist Cabal taking over Wikipedia Wikipedia Intelligence Report #001
The following is an incomplete list of those suspected to be members of, or to be the "useful idiots" of, the so-called "Elders of Wikipedia" (the Zionist cabal which has Wikipedia in its grip). Those at the top of the list are definite members and are the most ruthless and vicious of the bunch; those at the bottom I'm less sure about. Monitor the activities of the first 5 on the list (watch their user contribution pages and their user talk pages) and you'll have a good idea of what the entire gang is up to.
The suspected "Elders of Wikipedia" are:
Wow, it turns out I'm in charge of Wikipedia. Excellent, the world domination plan is proceeding as planned...
Jay.
Hmm, here's the plan Amalekite is proposing:
"I think that if there were enough white nationalists there (or at least more people who are Jew-wise, even if they are not white or tend to lean more to the libertarian left), the Zionist cabal would have a tough time keeping control. The Wikipedia system itself is pretty open and neutral - it's just that the place is infested with Jews. There's not even that many Jews there that I'd consider to be among the "Elders of Wikipedia" - maybe just 20 to 30 in all. That's why I think it's such a shame to let the bastards rule it. The kikes there are undoubtedly smart, but I think more importantly, they're well-organized, persistant, and know how the system works. If 20 or 30 of us could form a loose network on Wikipedia and basically follow in the Jews' example (i.e. synchronize our votes on important issues, support each others' edits, elect each other to administrator positions, contest the neutrality of the Jews' favorite articles, etc.), we could make life very difficult for them. If 60 of us were on there, we could probably seize control from them for good."
Not the first time they've thought of doing this. I wonder if they'll follow through this time.
Jay.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
JAY JG wrote:
Hmm, here's the plan Amalekite is proposing:
"I think that if there were enough white nationalists there (or at least more people who are Jew-wise, even if they are not white or tend to lean more to the libertarian left), the Zionist cabal would have a tough time keeping control. The Wikipedia system itself is pretty open and neutral
- it's just that the place is infested with Jews. There's not even that
many Jews there that I'd consider to be among the "Elders of Wikipedia"
- maybe just 20 to 30 in all. That's why I think it's such a shame to
let the bastards rule it. The kikes there are undoubtedly smart, but I think more importantly, they're well-organized, persistant, and know how the system works. If 20 or 30 of us could form a loose network on Wikipedia and basically follow in the Jews' example (i.e. synchronize our votes on important issues, support each others' edits, elect each other to administrator positions, contest the neutrality of the Jews' favorite articles, etc.), we could make life very difficult for them. If 60 of us were on there, we could probably seize control from them for good."
Not the first time they've thought of doing this. I wonder if they'll follow through this time.
Not that I could be bothered, but there's nothing to stop us doing exactly the same back to them :)
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
On 8/21/05, Alphax alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
JAY JG wrote:
Hmm, here's the plan Amalekite is proposing:
...
we could make life very difficult for them. If 60 of us were on there, we could probably seize control from them for good."
Not that I could be bothered, but there's nothing to stop us doing exactly the same back to them :)
Now now, there's no need to be uncooperative just because you don't share someone's POV. Being helpful is often a better solution.
In fact, I think I'll help them out by making them a skin - I'll call it Nazibook, white text on a white background.
That should keep everyone happy.
On 8/21/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
Hmm, here's the plan Amalekite is proposing:
"I think that if there were enough white nationalists there (or at least more people who are Jew-wise, even if they are not white or tend to lean more to the libertarian left), the Zionist cabal would have a tough time keeping control. The Wikipedia system itself is pretty open and neutral - it's just that the place is infested with Jews. There's not even that many Jews there that I'd consider to be among the "Elders of Wikipedia" - maybe just 20 to 30 in all. That's why I think it's such a shame to let the bastards rule it. The kikes there are undoubtedly smart, but I think more importantly, they're well-organized, persistant, and know how the system works. If 20 or 30 of us could form a loose network on Wikipedia and basically follow in the Jews' example (i.e. synchronize our votes on important issues, support each others' edits, elect each other to administrator positions, contest the neutrality of the Jews' favorite articles, etc.), we could make life very difficult for them. If 60 of us were on there, we could probably seize control from them for good."
Not the first time they've thought of doing this. I wonder if they'll follow through this time.
Jay.
Even if they do follow through, they crash and burn and most likely get banned.
"Ohh, that nice person who has been writing such brilliant prose on [Enter Neo-nazi topic here] has been nominated for adminship. Oh, and that excellent writer of "Why jews such ass" was the nominator! Ahh and the person that voted Keep on "Why jews suck ass" is the only supporter. Well, I hope the bureocrat sees this user for the wonderful person that he is"
Assuming that they are smart enough to actually try to organize this (they arn't) they will quickly find out that it wont work. They'll be recongnized for the trolls that they are.
--gkhan
PS. How the hell do they know the religion of the wikipedians? I've been here, what, little over a year now and I don't know any religion of any wikipedian. We probably are being overrun by jews! And presbytarians too probably, I hate those guys.
From: Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com
PS. How the hell do they know the religion of the wikipedians? I've been here, what, little over a year now and I don't know any religion of any wikipedian. We probably are being overrun by jews! And presbytarians too probably, I hate those guys.
Well, "Jew" isn't a religion, you know, it's a genetic defect. ;-)
Jay.
On 8/21/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com
PS. How the hell do they know the religion of the wikipedians? I've been here, what, little over a year now and I don't know any religion of any wikipedian. We probably are being overrun by jews! And presbytarians too probably, I hate those guys.
Well, "Jew" isn't a religion, you know, it's a genetic defect. ;-)
Jay.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
This is how I can be a methodist and a jew? :-)
PS. How the hell do they know the religion of the wikipedians? I've been here, what, little over a year now and I don't know any religion of any wikipedian. We probably are being overrun by jews! And presbytarians too probably, I hate those guys.
Hang around relgion pages and you will learn a few.
On 8/21/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
PS. How the hell do they know the religion of the wikipedians? I've been here, what, little over a year now and I don't know any religion of any wikipedian. We probably are being overrun by jews! And presbytarians too probably, I hate those guys.
Hang around relgion pages and you will learn a few.
-- geni
I imagine that that is painfully true.
--gkhan
*watches a forestfire start*
On 8/21/05, Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
PS. How the hell do they know the religion of the wikipedians? I've been here, what, little over a year now and I don't know any religion of any wikipedian. We probably are being overrun by jews! And presbytarians too probably, I hate those guys.
Hang around relgion pages and you will learn a few.
-- geni
I imagine that that is painfully true.
--gkhan _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Nazibook skin... white text on white background
ROFL.
Not the first time they've thought of doing this.
The Nazipedia idea has been around for a couple of years now, IIRC.
Assuming that they are smart enough to actually try to organize this (they arn't) they will quickly find out that it wont work. They'll be recongnized for
the > trolls that they are.
Some of them will crash and burn. But referring to people as smart or "not" or "trolls" doesnt do justice to the social ethics we've developed over the years. Positive handling will yield positive results. We've seen plenty of different kinds of POV-pushers come around before.
Regardless of what the original agenda, many eventually shape up, gain in literacy, feed their curiosity about the world, grow in knowledge of subjects of interest, make themselves useful, develop some general perspective, and gain freedom from those in their orbit who dwell in vexation.
SV
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Regardless of what the original agenda, many eventually shape up, gain in literacy, feed their curiosity about the world, grow in knowledge of subjects of interest, make themselves useful, develop some general perspective, and gain freedom from those in their orbit who dwell in vexation.
Very well put! It's important to think of people as individuals, even if they are part of fascist or racist movements. We have paedophiles contributing in good faith as was recently pointed out. I'm sure we also have nazis contributing in good faith and there's no reason to worry about that. (All homeopaths should be banned immediately, though.)
And if you read the conversations on the Stormfront message boards that have been linked to you'll see that User:Amalekite, who presents a well reasoned case and is obviously familiar with the workings of Wikipedia, does not manage to gather any new users for us. Other members of that board are content with "telling the truth about the Jews" on their own site.
This is consistent with my own attempts of recruiting new contributors. It's harder than one might think.
Regards, Haukur
You two have the moral highground on this one, I have to say. Any organised attempt to exclude or harass others based on their ideology, opinions or demographic not only makes them angrier (and in the case of racists reinforces their biases), but it also brings one right down to their level.
I'll never forget some talk show I saw once, where they had a former klansman and the black preacher who converted him with love and acceptance. That preacher had the moral highground. Any wikipedian who cares about the mission of wikipedia will accept these guys reading and editing our articles. Why? Because the diversity of information and people involved is '''bound''' to have a positive effect on them. It is bound to make them better people, if only slightly. As I always say, any progress is good progress.And thats why we are here, to help others grow.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 8/21/05, Haukur Þorgeirsson haukurth@hi.is wrote:
Regardless of what the original agenda, many eventually shape up, gain in literacy, feed their curiosity about the world, grow in knowledge of subjects of interest, make themselves useful, develop some general perspective, and gain freedom from those in their orbit who dwell in vexation.
Very well put! It's important to think of people as individuals, even if they are part of fascist or racist movements. We have paedophiles contributing in good faith as was recently pointed out. I'm sure we also have nazis contributing in good faith and there's no reason to worry about that. (All homeopaths should be banned immediately, though.)
And if you read the conversations on the Stormfront message boards that have been linked to you'll see that User:Amalekite, who presents a well reasoned case and is obviously familiar with the workings of Wikipedia, does not manage to gather any new users for us. Other members of that board are content with "telling the truth about the Jews" on their own site.
This is consistent with my own attempts of recruiting new contributors. It's harder than one might think.
Regards, Haukur
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
You two have the moral highground on this one, I have to say.
Thank you, Jack, and I loved that story about the preacher. But it's actually very easy to stand up on the moral hill and look stoically over the battle - it's more difficult and more important to get down into the trenches and try to get some NPOV work done.
In that spirit I tried making some changes to [[Eustace Mullins]]. Please edit without mercy. I think I'm neutral here but it's the neutrality of ignorance, I never heard about the man until today.
Regards, Haukur
I hadn't heard of him either, but my edits didn't go very well on that page and I stepped back pretty quick. One of the things that scares me about the wikipedia is how many conflicted pages I have walked away from. I wish RfC worked better, but how many people '''want''' to edit a conflicted article? Me, I have way more fun with the obscure ones, like [[Hawthorne Effect]] or [[kosas]] ;) It doesn't hurt that the few fellow editors from those pages happen to be extremely friendly and nice to be around, either.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 8/22/05, Haukur Þorgeirsson haukurth@hi.is wrote:
You two have the moral highground on this one, I have to say.
Thank you, Jack, and I loved that story about the preacher. But it's actually very easy to stand up on the moral hill and look stoically over the battle - it's more difficult and more important to get down into the trenches and try to get some NPOV work done.
In that spirit I tried making some changes to [[Eustace Mullins]]. Please edit without mercy. I think I'm neutral here but it's the neutrality of ignorance, I never heard about the man until today.
Regards, Haukur
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 8/22/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
I wish RfC worked better, but how many people '''want''' to edit a conflicted article?
At least it means you are editing an article people care about
geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of Wikipedia; it turns out the chief Jew is Jimbo himself: [http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311] They also appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to get around blocks.
Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish douchebag, and he seems omnipresent." That one really hurt. Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
Jay.
JAY JG wrote:
Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of Wikipedia; it turns out the chief Jew is Jimbo himself: [http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311] They also appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to get around blocks.
Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish douchebag, and he seems omnipresent." That one really hurt. Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to "Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
Of course that would then lead to questions of whether it's a Gardnerian, Alexandrian, Lycian or Eclectiv coven - but hey, these are neo-nazis who don't let a little thing like religious accuracy get in their way. We're all devil worshippers and Jimbo sacrifices babies at the clambake every third Tuesday of the month, right?
;-)
- Arkady (who happens to be Wiccan....)
Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of tech skills, nor from lack of users. It is lack of dough. From looking at what Wikimedia needs to raise and see how much they spend on just running the sites, I do not think Stormfront would have enough dough to pull it off. And most companies will probably not waste their time or money dealing with neo-Nazis. It's very, very un-PC for companies to deal with fascists.
Regards,
Zachary Harden
From: Arkady Rose arkady@arkady.org.uk Reply-To: arkady@arkady.org.uk,English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: A neo-Nazi wikipedia Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:46:03 +0100
JAY JG wrote:
Sadly, I appear to no longer be in control of Wikipedia; it turns out the chief Jew is Jimbo himself: [http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=187311] They also appear to have figured out anonymous proxies, TOR proxies, and dailup IPs, and have advised their use (and used them with some success) to get around blocks.
Oh, and regarding me, "That Jayjg guy is a real partisan Jewish douchebag, and he seems omnipresent." That one really hurt. Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to "Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
Of course that would then lead to questions of whether it's a Gardnerian, Alexandrian, Lycian or Eclectiv coven - but hey, these are neo-nazis who don't let a little thing like religious accuracy get in their way. We're all devil worshippers and Jimbo sacrifices babies at the clambake every third Tuesday of the month, right?
;-)
- Arkady (who happens to be Wiccan....)
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
From: "Zachary Harden" zscout370@hotmail.com
Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of tech skills, nor from lack of users.
I think it would be more likely to fail due to the many obvious failings of its proponents. See, for example, the posts of JohnJoyTree in that thread, the only one there who appears to have a clue.
Jay.
Zachary Harden wrote:
Well, personally, this is going to fail. Not because of their lack of tech skills, nor from lack of users. It is lack of dough. From looking at what Wikimedia needs to raise and see how much they spend on just running the sites, I do not think Stormfront would have enough dough to pull it off. And most companies will probably not waste their time or money dealing with neo-Nazis. It's very, very un-PC for companies to deal with fascists.
I'm visiting Best Buy's corporate headquarters in Minnesota today and so I can't even look at the link to see what horrible thing they said about me, because their site is blocked by the corporate firewall. :-)
--Jimbo
Arkady Rose stated for the record:
What had me giggling was the line about 'the term "Wiki" refers to "Wicca"' - these guys really do not have a clue about what a wiki really is or the origins of the word, do they? Heh. So next will we be accused of secretly running a coven? Oh, no, wait - don't tell me, that's the Secret Cabal of Administrators, right?
There are twelve of us on the ArbComm, and Jimbo makes thirt-- oh, wait, I shouldn't have said that. THERE ARE NO SECRET MEMBERS OF THE CABAL. FNORD.
Crap. Now I'm going to have to use the Orbital Mind Control Lasers to erase their knowledge of the Secret 33rd-Degree Arbiters....
On 8/22/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
Omnipresent? Is that a euphemism for fat? :-O
Jay.
Yes. I'm too am a little omnipresent at the moment. My girlfriend tries to push hermithood on me reguraly, and it doesn't help very much. :S
--gkhan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Amalekite&action=history
This user, and a great number of IP's, were blocked without a cause relating to blocking policy. I think that was a crass thing to do.
Jack (Sam Spade)
He was blocked for being a Nazi?
I've looked at his edits (briefly) and can't see anything that he's actually done wrong.
Theresa
On 8/23/05, Jack Lynch jack.i.lynch@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Amalekite&action=history
This user, and a great number of IP's, were blocked without a cause relating to blocking policy. I think that was a crass thing to do.
Jack (Sam Spade) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 8/23/05, Theresa Knott theresaknott@gmail.com wrote:
He was blocked for being a Nazi?
I've looked at his edits (briefly) and can't see anything that he's actually done wrong.
Theresa
Oh here we go. This is his stormfront post http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=225536
"A cabal of Jews and their liberal-gentile "useful idiots" are trying to take over Wikipedia" "The gang of kikes at Wikipedia managed to knock the site Jew Watch off the top of the Google search results page last year" "Don't let these vampire rodents pull one more media outlet from out of our hands."
If he said that on Wikipedia I'd definately block him for it. As it is he said it off Wikipedia. I'm not comfotable about blocking someone under those circumstances.
Theresa
--- Theresa Knott theresaknott@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/23/05, Theresa Knott theresaknott@gmail.com wrote:
He was blocked for being a Nazi?
I've looked at his edits (briefly) and can't see anything that he's actually done wrong.
Theresa
Oh here we go. This is his stormfront post http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=225536
"A cabal of Jews and their liberal-gentile "useful idiots" are trying to take over Wikipedia" "The gang of kikes at Wikipedia managed to knock the site Jew Watch off the top of the Google search results page last year" "Don't let these vampire rodents pull one more media outlet from out of our hands."
In the same post, he also says,
"However, if you're going to join in on editing the Mullins article (which I hope you do), follow the rules of the place - no insults or personal attacks, no Jew-bashing (though they so richly deserve it), try to keep a Neutral Point-of-View (NPOV), and stay cool, no matter how hard they push your buttons."
-- Matt [[User:Matt Crypto]]
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Crypto Blog: http://cipher-text.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Two reasons were given, both related to comments he made outside the wiki.
*20:34, 22 August 2005 SlimVirgin (added that the account is blocked indefinitely, because Amalekite is posting elsewhere that this is his homepage)
*00:21, 20 August 2005 Homeontherange blocked "User:Amalekite" with an expiry time of indefinite (neo-nazi Troll soliciting other trolls off of Stormfront)
Anyways, this sort of stuff makes me sad, and IMO encourages these sorts of people in their beliefs.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 8/23/05, Theresa Knott theresaknott@gmail.com wrote:
He was blocked for being a Nazi?
I've looked at his edits (briefly) and can't see anything that he's actually done wrong.
Theresa
From: Jack Lynch jack.i.lynch@gmail.com
Anyways, this sort of stuff makes me sad, and IMO encourages these sorts of people in their beliefs.
It's rather absurd to think that being blocked from Wikipedia is what encourages them in their beliefs. They come to Wikipedia as full-blown haters, and there's little to suggest that their inserting their POV into Wikipedia will change that.
Jay.