On 10/17/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
AC cases are one-offs. They really are. They are supposed to fix up situations by a mixture of equity and safeguarding the Wikipedia mission. There is no precedent set by a remedy. Principles are pieces of reasoning drawing on written policy and other things, and are mainly there to connect general understandings with the bottom line.
If this is so, why has the MONGO case been constantly referred to as if it is policy?
Because some people attempt to gain advantage in the debate by doing so, and because some people don't know better.
And how did Arbcom manage to create an exemption to the 3RR if the case is a one-off?
Lost me on this one.
Thatcher