--- Robert rkscience100@yahoo.com wrote:
Folks, we still have a major problem. There are many people here who unfortunately refuse to cite sources, engage in original research, write things that are just false and bizarre.
And the ArbCom is already charged with enforcing all Wikipedia policies, including those that are about content (such as NPOV, NOR, and Verifiability). We have in fact ruled in this area several times before but have been usually limited to cases that are fairly obvious.
Spotting subtle POV, original research, or fringe ideas masquerading as more mainstream than they are takes a fair amount of pre-existing knowledge in the relevant subject area. This is something that the current ArbCom could never have.
Thus my idea of having vetted panels of respected users who have demonstrated knowledge in certain areas that the ArbCom could call upon to help it distinguish what is what.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/RFC#Alternat...
-- mav
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com