Tony Sidaway wrote:
Christiaan Briggs said:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Christiaan Briggs said:
To use a browser as you suggest defers ALL images. This way defers some images.
That is true, and that is precisely the problem. In my opinion deferring *all* images is the only way that is consistent with NPOV. *You*, as an editor, cannot know which images *I* want deferred.
You are not being honest with yourself or I Tony.
Please refrain from personal attacks.
It is only an observation of events Tony. You refuse to discuss this matter on meta wishing instead to keep going around in circles on this email list. Do you not remember that it was you who described the process of deference leaving the user precisely in control:
"No blocking of any kind occurs; further requests for material are simply deferred until the user requests them. This is a simple and elegant solution to the filtering problem; the user decides precisely what he does and does not want to see."
I do not expect a rational response from you I'm afraid.
Christiaan