Joe Szilagyi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Simetrical wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:37 PM, David Goodman wrote:
of the first 4 examples, the first 3 are perfectly valid content--that the object it is of wood is relevant to the meaning. The 4th is an example otherwise-- unless the nature of the fence does for some reason figure in the story.
You aren't seriously suggesting that "The wand used by Harry Potter is made of wood from a holly tree" should actually be permitted to be in the [[Wood]] article, are you? I'd sure remove that if I saw it
Of course it should be removed from [[Wood]]. The fact clearly belongs in [[Holly]].
Or maybe [[Hollywood]]? :-P
Sorry, I couldn't help that one.
Ec