On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:18 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
There's a strong cultural bias against locking articles at all,
[snip]
For particular perennially problematic subject areas, this would mean semipermanent locking would only be applied by arbcom ruling, and even
[snip]
I believe ZOMG WTF WP:ARBCOMNOTFORCONTENTDISPUTES would be the expected response to that?
As a counterexample here, [[Views of Lyndon LaRouche]] which was (for all intents and purposes) permanently full protected nine months ago by me to end a contentious content war, and remains so today.
It seems to have worked well...