On 12/13/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:21:02 +0000, charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
OK, not going to be 'popular'. Do you suggest we look at the evidence, or
the buzz?
I suggest that the context and history also needs to be considered as a mitigating factor.
See this section with respect to context: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Seabhcan/P
roposed_decision#MONGO.27s_habitual_over-reaction
I would encourage anyone interested in this (and everyone else) to review a couple very well thought out reactions to this decision:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Seabhca n/Proposed_decision#Comments_on_proposed_decision
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Seabhca n/Proposed_decision#Unprotection.3F -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.16/582 - Release Date: 12/11/2006 4:32 PM