On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 18:39 -0400, Marc Riddell wrote:
on 9/3/07 6:32 PM, Casey Brown at cbrown1023.ml@gmail.com wrote:
Can I ask you a question now?
- If a moderator flat-out denies any or all of your "wants", will you drop
it?
No.
You just don't get it do you? The moderators among others have said what they're going to provide and what they're not going to provide. Mark Ryan for example have provided more details than I'm sure most others would bother. Someone somewhere along this thread mentioned the only way that's likely to change is for the community to demonstrate they want such a list, which the community from discussion on this thread have clearly demonstrate the lack of such consensus.
- Any person on moderation who chooses not to be identified on this
list, has the right not to be.
And the presumption should be as have been said, is in favour of privacy, and so an opt-in system, rather than an opt-out one, and those who is on moderation have been offered exactly that in discussing why they're on moderation.
I quote from your response to being asked who told you a certain person was on moderation : "it was told to me in confidence - and it must remain that way". The person in concern have not posted to the list since, saying he or she is that person, and have the list debate whether it was correct or not that this person is indeed on moderation, presumingly because they don't want to have that discussed here. What makes you think any other people on moderation wants any different treatment???
KTC