Katefan0 wrote:
Personally, I think it's just about right that the policy state that information without a source may be removed. (Perhaps it should be more pointed -- disputed information without a source). Didn't Jimbo say as much in one of his responses to Seigenthaler?
k
How about "disputed unsourced information may be removed, but you should note this on the talk page, preferably with your reason for removing it".
-- Neil