On Nov 29, 2007 7:49 PM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:44 PM, Sam Blacketer sam.blacketer@googlemail.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 12:16 AM, Alec Conroy alecmconroy@gmail.com wrote:
Alec, how can people show you e-mails they say don't exist to begin
with?
I'm sorry, but to my knowledge, nobody has actually seriously said such conversations don't exist.
That's asking people to prove a negative. Has Durova, or has anyone else who was actually party to discussions, said anything that indicates there ever was a discussion offwiki on the specific subject of whether !! should be banned?
"Banned", "blocked", "investigated". I don't see how it makes a difference in this particular case.
I'm getting tired. Can someone else please explain to Anthony what the difference between a ban, a block, and an investigation are?