For me, I would just state that the current proposal as enunciated by Erik appears on the face of it an endorsement of open season on articles. I don't like the idea one bit.
I am not sure if Erik remembers the intricate shenanigans used to try to erase all knowledge of Catholic Priests Pedophilia from wikipedia (or at the very least attempting to orphan the article with the details). In any case my personal position is that although we should emphasize improving what we have, over adding more minutiae, we should also emphasize *keeping* what we have, over erasing it, when what we have is of value.
On 3/1/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/28/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
And I thought someone just claimed notability was reasons for instant-keep, not reasons to delete.
That was me - and I was stating the way I thought things SHOULD be, not the way they are currently applied.
-Matt
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l