I think it was generally agreed that this debate was going at cross-purposes, with me arguing from a page point of view and others from a content point of view.
I am, however, intrigued you brought this up again after three weeks! ;=)
Sam
On 12/11/05, Ryan Delaney ryan.delaney@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Sam Korn wrote:
On 11/20/05, Ryan Delaney ryan.delaney@gmail.com wrote:
A merge vote means "merge the content elsewhere and then create a redirect". Someone who votes merge doesn't want the page deleted, they want the content merged elsewhere. It's important to understand this, because if we copy content and then delete the original article, we are violating the GFDL by failing to preserve the edit history. Instead, we merge content and create a redirect.
Consequently, there is no need for the closing administrator to count "merge" as anything but a keep vote. Someone who votes merge wants the article kept, because the article must be kept in order to merge the content and comply with the GFDL.
Ryan
How do you know that they want the article kept?
Because of the requirements of the GFDL, like I explained.
Ryan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDnKDv6MKb8lYmCtcRAtcjAKCe2xr1j2GmDSBKaGOTVL/Je/VYCwCcCey0 z2OleB3wXfCAA9QRe5ovzRE= =K60N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Sam