On 3/13/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/13/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
(now that semi-protection exists I can't personally think of a scenario where full protection is *ever* a good idea).
Pages being hit repeatedly by vandles useing sleeper accounts.
Surely there can't be enough sleeper accounts to keep this up for very long. Maybe I'm wrong here, though. I always thought it was strange that there was no minimum number of edits factored into the semi-protection criteria.
Very high profile pages
Good point. I was thinking of articles, but I can see why you might want to protect some administrative pages.
multi participant edit war particularly for three or more
Wouldn't it be better to block the edit warriors?
Pages I don't want even admins to edit (election pages and the like).
Along with high profile pages, good point.
Anthony