On 8/23/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/22/06, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
New articles are still important, as you've pointed out... But I've seen no evidence that new article creation belongs even on the top 100 task list for making our encyclopedia not suck.
I'd certainly put it in the top 100, even the top 10, although probably not the top 3. When a user looks up an article, the worst possible result would be to find a misleading or otherwise incorrect article.
Why's that so bad? They can just edit it to fix it.
how do they know it is misleading or otherwise incorrect?