Frankly, I don't think we should fix the "problem" that the post sees. We reflect the world that surrounds us, and academic writing is a lot stodgier than it was in the 1950s. Frankly, FAs waste enough time worrying about style, and nowhere near enough time on sourcing. We shouldn't encourage that.
RR
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:35 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The evolved Wikipedia house style is a grey stodgy morass. Some bits are better written than others, but it's getting noted:
http://www.edexcellence.net/flypaper/index.php/2008/05/wikipedia-enabling-th...
(that's a blog post quoting a book that isn't online)
How to fix this scalably?
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l