Brock Weller wrote:
I'll give you a definition, information presented with little or no context that does not contribute to the encyclopedia value of the article.
Is it then your assertion that all content listed under the "Trivia" heading of all articles falls under this definition? If not, how can you justify wholesale deletion of all trivia sections?
I am not interested in arguing about your definition of trivia, though I suspect you might find quite a bit of disagreement from others. It is interesting to note that Wikipedia does have an article on [[Trivia]], and an intriguing definition. Though perhaps not all that useful to this conversation.