On 12/21/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 12/21/06, theProject wp.theproject@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/21/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 12/20/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
that one may not upload a small, low resolution line drawing of the USS Enterprise? without violating copyright?
No, it isn't. Fair use is not a violation of copyright...
According to what I understand, fair use is a defence for copyright violation -- thus it assumes that copyright violation has already occurred.
You're half right. Fair use is a defense for copyright violation. But if you successfully defend against a charge of copyright violation, it means the copyright violation hasn't occurred. Copying may have occurred, but not a copyright violation.
To change the topic slightly, I was quite pleased to see that the Wikipedia article on [[Fair Use]] dispels the myth that fair use is a defense and not a right (a myth that seems to be spread by many Wikipedians). From the article:
--- The frequent argument over whether fair use is a "right" or a "defense" [2] is generated by confusion over the use of the term "affirmative defense." An affirmative defense is simply a term of art from litigation reflecting the timing in which the defense is raised. It does not distinguish between "rights" and "defenses", and so it does not characterize the substance of the defendant's actions as "not a right but a defense." The First Amendment, for instance, is generally raised as an affirmative defense in litigation, but is clearly a "right." Similarly, while fair use is characterized as a defense in terms of the litigation posture, Section 107 defines fair use as a "limitation" on copyright law and states clearly that "the fair use of a copyrighted work ... is not an infringement of copyright." ---
Fair use is a defense (*). It's also a right (*). And fair use is not an infringement of copyright (*).
Anthony
(*) in the US