Okay, I appreciate that listing the article name may prompt investigative types to go searching for the deleted revisions on dumps. But to close off all public record of this potentially GFDL-violating tool is very worrying to me.
Is there *any* reason not to have a bare log of oversight actions? Even without the page title, I'd like to see who removes an edit and when, with a reason (like "Personal Information"). Perhaps with some sort of unique tag (in the style of the autoblocks). This information would in no way give away the version removed or from what page it was removed, and it would reveal who was using the tools the most. Like:
22:17, 23 June 2006 Jimbo Wales removed a revision (ID #123456789). Reason given was: "Personally identifiable information"
Any reason why that is unacceptable?
~Mark Ryan